NTT: 68 of 100 on Ora's agent-readiness scan

In short

NTT scores 68 of 100 on Ora's agent-readiness scan, grade C, read on 10 November 2026. 79 percent of the 132,085 domains Ora ranks score under 60, and the average score is 44. A clean door, a 0.8 percent home page, and one fix worth 14 points.

The score

NTT is a telecommunications group based in Tokyo.

  • 68of 100, grade C
    Ora's agent-readiness scan of group.ntt, read 10 November 2026.
  • 8Discovery, of 9
    Whether assistants find the company: search presence, Wikipedia and Wikidata, catalogues.
  • 23Access, of 38
    Whether they can read it: the door, text without JavaScript, llms.txt, structured data.
  • 10Usability, of 16
    Whether they can act through it: an MCP server, an API with a specification, sign-in for agents.
  • 0Payments, of 0
    No check in this layer applied to the site.

79 percent of the 132,085 domains Ora ranks score under 60, and the average score is 44.

Ora's one-line summary: NTT's group site offers a solid discovery and crawler-policy foundation, but lacks WebMCP support and any agent instruction file with when-to-use guidance.

What an assistant meets at the door

Before an assistant can read, compare or buy, it has to get in. These rows are the door: whether the bot shield lets the main agents through, what robots.txt tells the search, training and user-triggered agents, and whether the home page has text without running JavaScript.

The door at group.ntt
CheckResultWhat Ora saw
Not blocked by bot detectionPass, 2 of 2Site accessible to 4 agent user-agents (ChatGPT-User, OAI-SearchBot, Claude-User, PerplexityBot).
Agent crawler reachabilityPass, 2 of 2Reachable to every agent we tested - ChatGPT-User: reachable, OAI-SearchBot: reachable, Claude-User: reachable, PerplexityBot: reachable
robots.txt AI crawler policyPass, 2 of 2AI search crawlers: allowed in 18 of 18 checks (3 crawlers on 6 pages). AI training crawlers: allowed in 12 of 12 checks (2 crawlers on 6 pages), not scored.
robots.txt agent-user policyPass, 2 of 2No applicable crawl or usage restriction found for 3 user-triggered agents (chatgpt-user, claude-user, perplexity-user) on 1 public page: https://group.ntt/. Declared policy only;
Content without JavaScriptPartial, 1 of 3Homepage: 3492 chars with H1, but 0.8% content ratio is below the 5% target. Sampled pages with almost no text without JavaScript (2 of 5): https://group.ntt/en/group/gnavi/group/ntt-logosco/ (0 chars) and.
Homepage not hidden from searchPass, 1 of 1No noindex on the homepage: no robots, googlebot or bingbot meta tag and no X-Robots-Tag header hides it from search.

What it can read, and what it can do

The reading layer is what an assistant takes away from the pages: a text file written for it, markdown on request, structured data about the company, a sitemap. The act layer is whether it can do anything through a published interface rather than by clicking through the site.

Reading group.ntt
CheckResultWhat Ora saw
llms.txt existsFail, 0 of 1No llms.txt found at /llms.txt or /.well-known/llms.txt.
llms.txt formattingFail, 0 of 2No llms.txt found to evaluate quality
Markdown agent docsFail, 0 of 1Missing markdown content negotiation. Homepage returned text/html when probed with Accept: text/markdown (expected text/markdown), and none of the well-known root paths (/llms.md, /auth.md, /agents.md, /developers.md).
Bot-UA markdown servingFail, 0 of 1No probed bot User-Agent (ChatGPT-User, Claude-User, Perplexity-User) receives markdown when requesting HTML. Optional: detect AI-bot UAs server-side and serve them a markdown representation directly.
JSON-LD structured dataPartial, 3 of 4JSON-LD Organization found - missing description and url on this entity
Organization schema completenessPartial, 1 of 2Organization schema found but missing: contactPoint, address
Sitemap existsPass, 2 of 2Valid sitemap found at https://group.ntt/sitemap.xml with 10922 entries
Metadata completenessPass, 2 of 2All metadata signals present: canonical URL, lang="en", og:image, og:type
Page token budgetPass, 1 of 1All 6 measured pages fit an agent context budget (largest ~6K tokens)
Acting through group.ntt
CheckResultWhat Ora saw
MCP server / manifestDid not apply, 0 of 6No MCP server or manifest found
MCP well-known discoveryFail, 0 of 2No MCP server URL discovered
Public API with reachable endpointsDid not apply, 0 of 7No publicly reachable API surface detected (REST and GraphQL both absent or auth-gated)
Public API/docs linked from homepageDid not apply, 0 of 3No public API or documentation page linked from homepage
OpenAPI spec publishedDid not apply, 0 of 7No OpenAPI/Swagger specification found
Developer portalDid not apply, 0 of 6No developer portal found
OAuth 2.0 supportDid not apply, 0 of 5No OAuth 2.0 or OpenID Connect support detected
Scoped permissionsDid not apply, 0 of 5No declared OAuth scopes, security schemes, or scoped-permission documentation found
Multi-language SDK packagesDid not apply, 0 of 3No SDK packages found across language ecosystems
CLI tool availableDid not apply, 0 of 3No CLI tool found
WebMCP supportFail, 0 of 5No WebMCP support detected - no document.modelContext / navigator.modelContext usage found (scanned 9 of 9 same-origin script bundle(s) for modelContext registrations)
Finding NTT
CheckResultWhat Ora saw
Wikipedia / Wikidata entity presencePartial, 2 of 4Wikidata Q1054787 (NTT, Inc.) verified - draft a Wikipedia page with cited references to complete knowledge graph coverage
Brand name discoverabilityPass, 3 of 3group.ntt ranks #5 for "NTT" (searched your brand name alone: no main product term from your homepage qualified)
Category share of voiceDid not apply, 0 of 6Category share of voice is in beta. It measures whether agents surface you for capability and use-case searches (not just your name).
Developer resource discoverabilityDid not apply, 0 of 3In a search for your API docs, none of the 10 results is your official docs

The six payment checks did not apply on this read: Ora did not read the site as a shop.

Three fixes to hand to the web team

Ora estimates how many points each open check would return. These are the largest on this read, in Ora's words where it gave them, so a leader can hand the list over without translating it.

  1. WebMCP support, worth about 13.9 points by Ora's estimate: No WebMCP support detected - no document.modelContext / navigator.modelContext usage found (scanned 9 of 9 same-origin script bundle(s) for modelContext registrations).
  2. Agent-friendly 404s, worth about 2.8 points by Ora's estimate: The nonexistent path https://group.ntt/__ora-404-probe-0zn1omhh correctly returns HTTP 404. Partial credit: no Markdown error body was detected.
  3. Agent auth discovery metadata, worth about 2.6 points by Ora's estimate: Neither /.well-known/oauth-protected-resource nor /.well-known/oauth-authorization-server found. Probed: group.ntt, api.group.ntt.

Our read

NTT's group site is a well-kept front door with little behind it for an agent to do. All four test agents reached the home page, robots.txt allowed the AI search crawlers in 18 of 18 checks across six pages and the training crawlers in 12 of 12, and no restriction applies to the user-triggered agents; Discovery reads 8 of 9. What an assistant can read is thinner than the door suggests: 3,492 characters with an H1 at a 0.8 percent content ratio, 2 of 5 sampled pages with almost no text without JavaScript, a sitemap of 10,922 entries, complete metadata, an Organization block missing its description and url, and no llms.txt. What it can do is nothing yet: neither an API nor OAuth, no MCP server or developer portal, and a search for NTT's API documentation found none of the 10 results official. A C at 68 where one fix, WebMCP, is worth about 14 points, and the rest are change.

Test your own site

Run the same scan on your own domain at ora.ai. The score, the layers and the fixes on this page come from its public result for group.ntt; a scan of a public site takes a few minutes and needs no account.

Sources

  1. Ora report for group.ntt (ora.ai/score/group.ntt), read 10 Nov 2026. Vendor claim.

Last reviewed